PsychoHAistoryResearch Initiative

Research track R01

Agent Behavioral Patterns

Can operational behaviors of AI agents be measured consistently across tasks?

Status: Conceptual A research hypothesis — not a claim of proven functionality.

Hypothesis

A small set of observable execution traits — retry tendency, tool-use breadth, verification habits, escalation rate — is stable enough within an agent configuration to be measured repeatably across different tasks.

Proposed methodology

  • Define trait metrics from execution traces before collecting data.
  • Run fixed agent configurations on a benchmark task suite at least three times each.
  • Estimate test–retest reliability per trait; drop traits below a pre-set threshold.

Required data

  • Execution traces (tool calls, retries, verifications, escalations) with timestamps.
  • Task metadata: type, size, outcome.
  • Agent configuration: model, prompts, tools, policies.

Evaluation metrics

  • Test–retest reliability (ICC) per trait.
  • Between-configuration separation.
  • Stability under task-type change.

Current status

Conceptual. No data has been collected and no experiment has been registered for this track.

Known uncertainties

  • Agent behavior may change with every model update, limiting the lifetime of any measurement.
  • Traits may depend more on the task than on the agent.

Source references

  • Shrout & Fleiss (1979), intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86(2).

Related concept notes